Javascript Menu by
2009 Head-2-Head Bow Test - 2009 Compound Bows rated by speed, kick, draw, noise, and feel
2009 Compound Bows

2009 H2H Intro
H2H Prologue
Voting and Test Procedure
2009 H2H Evaluation Team
Special Thanks

Subjective Results

Noise Level
Balance / Feel
Draw Cycle

Score Data Sheet



2009 Bow Evaluation Commentary

Rytera Alien X
Elite GT500
Mathews Reezen 6.5
Diamond IceMan
Quest HPS 33
Hoyt AlphaMax 32
Bowtech Admiral
Martin Warthog

Bowtech Admiral

Personal Commentary by Jon Silks about the Bowtech Admiral:

Bowtech's Admiral came on strong in the test and jumped from #3 to #2 in the overall results when speed was factored in. This bow is much like the Diamond Iceman with a little better speed. The two rigs dominated the shot noise and shock/vibration categories. The Admiral took top honors in the shot noise arena with one of the quietest shots I have ever heard out of a compound bow - truly remarkable! Handling the Admiral was a comfortable experience as the grip's two wood side panels were well blended with the riser and the overall size was well chosen. In the shock/vibration category the Admiral could have easily been number one, as it flirted with the top spot often, only to be edged out by its brother. Only in the draw cycle category did the Admiral miss out on the top five. The Admiral is simply one of the best bows you will find on pro shop racks.



Bow Specs:

Axle-to-axle length: 31 1/16"
Brace Height: 7.5"
Mass weight: 4.1 pounds
Let-off: 65-80%
Draw lengths: 24-30"
Peak draw weights:

40, 50, 60, and 70 lbs



Using this Table:

Kinetic Energy:  (in foot-pounds) This is the energy that actually goes into propelling the arrow. Basically it is the energy that is left over from the stored energy after all of the bow system friction is accounted for.
Stored Energy:  (in foot-pounds) When you draw the bow you supply power/energy into the limbs. The amount of energy that the limbs can hold is known as the stored energy.
Efficiency Rating:  (in %) This is the amount of the stored energy (in %) that can be successfully transferred into propelling the arrow upon release. The bow design, including limbs, limb pockets, cam systems, and axle types play into the bow’s efficiency. An example would be a sealed ball bearing in the idler wheel verses a simple unsealed rod bearing. It takes more energy to rotate the unsealed rod bearing (more friction) verses the sealed ball bearing (less friction) so more of the bow’s potential energy is used. The end result is a lower efficiency rating because less stored energy is left over to propel the arrow.
Power Stroke: This is the actual distance that the archer moves the string from its resting position to full draw.
EBFM Value: Draw weight as measured by the Easton Bow Force Mapper System hand-held unit.

Using This Graph:

The area under the graph signifies the amount of energy stored by the system from brace height to full draw (power stroke). The shape of the curve is generated by a plot of draw weight in pounds against draw length in inches and gives an indication of how the bow will feel when drawn. The more rounded the curve the more "smooth" the feel of the draw cycle, however, if the curve is "squared-off" it will likely feel more aggressive. The trade off comes in performance, as the more aggressive curve is generally indicitive of more stored energy and more speed.




  • Sitka Gear